*
occupy wallstreet as “the real representation of the left” (an extreme or uncompromised form of it) (“democrats” perhaps being the compromised form of it or being thought of as its compromised form, maybe being its own thing apart from “the left”) (“real” meaning “bringing Christianity to Christendom”) (No: “real” being “what is called ‘collectivism'”) (No: “real” meaning The Philosopher King) the aim is only to communicate and never to do, communication is action in this world: there is only politics, never governance, and yet that governs
tea party as an unreal inauthentic version of the extreme right; (the authentic extreme right would be entirely apolitical: it would be Polyphemos, Buddha, Thoreau, indifferent to politics, pure individualism) (the uncompromised conservative is the serene Buddha???)
(Nazis as the “real”, meaning thoroughly militarized, version of the inauthentic extreme right.) (Inauthentic because concerned with other humans –with politics– when their true interest is individuals –speech, let alone violence, is too much interaction.)
The extremes as being devoted to peaceful activity or inactivity above all else –is one one of, or one in, many?– is the distinction.
*
.i`` * ^ / . . . . . ` `~ 