What was missing from the scene of the young man walking in his bright red coat?
Was it the roughness and the crudeness of the path that was missing, now a black, blemishless asphalt strip?
Was it an irregular distribution of the vegetation that was missed, the furry tops of the grasses and their irregular heights? The crude individuality of natural things prematurely manicured and cut away by the work crews?
Was it that the redness of the red coat was a “red beyond red”, and a “bright beyond bright”, and that this somehow had created the lack? And that nothing, from out of this whole Fall scene would be “missed”, and all would return to normal, once this offending article of clothing was out of sight? once the young man and his red coat strode from view?
Or rather, once the red coat had strode from view, would there still be something missing?
Would the sense of something being missing even increase with the loss of the coat?
Was it the coat, indeed, that most signified or stood for the thing that was actually absent?
Was it the Fall, the climate, as I had known it, that was actually absent?
Was its marker or headstone this bright red winter coat?