Writing about typing though, in this case, at a cash register:

“register“

William Shakespeare,Charles Dickens,James Joyce,Franz Kafka
(with ‘Fyodor Dostoyevsky‘; with only the last names; “Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky“

*

The idea that mass communicated speech, without dialectic, is either (a) not to be considered as being in a serious way “speech” or (b) to be considered as speech that is inherently unfree, and thus not to be protected, in either case, under the first amendment.

Thus, the Lincoln-Douglas debates, even if televised, would be considered free and protected speech, as it contained “dialectic”; while a commercial saying merely “vote no on proposition 11” would not be protected (for being mass-communicated while containing no dialectic); while a person telling his friends and neighbors to “vote no on prop eleven” would be protected speech (as, though not dialectic, it is also not mass-communicated).

(How might one determine whether or not speech contained “dialectic”? — What would be the test?)

* * *

A RE-REFORMATION (a reunion), in which the religions of the world would unite or reunite (all religions? all Christian religions?) to re-establish the question of religion, to cast in more vivid colors where we are now: supposing all religion is equally right or equally wrong, what are its principles, what is the alternative, what is its justification? What is the worldliness that is the opposite of all these religions? (is it “worldliness” that is the opposite?)

*

From The Dan Green / Biblioklept interview.

Biblioklept: I’ll admit to a mild fascination (if you’ll forgive the oxymoron) with literary Missouri. It’s not just the pedigree—Mark Twain, Kate Chopin, William Burroughs, Stanley Elkin, William Gass, Maya Angelou, Marianne Moore…Jonathan Franzen—but also the geographical location itself, which, at least in my imagination, seems to mix urban with rural, West with South (and a shot of East, perhaps). Is there a Missouri literature? What is it?

DG: Except for Twain, most of the great Missouri writers were from St. Louis. Eliot and Burroughs were born there (as was Kate Chopin), Tennessee Williams mostly grew up there. Elkin and Gass were imports, but did most of their writing there. I can’t really see much connection among them, except for Gass and Elkin, who were united in their literary sensibilities. Eliot fled and never looked back, Burroughs as well. Williams switched allegiance to the deeper South. There’s not much specifically “Missouri” about their work, although I sometimes think there’s not much “Missouri” in Missouri either. It’s exactly in the middle of the country, and, as you say, other regionalisms sort of converge here. Missouri has produced and continues to produce good writers, but I’m not aware of many in-common themes or preoccupations. Most of the writers I’ve mentioned were pretty cosmopolitan in their concerns. Even Twain, ultimately.

s.ag.i
ingsi. sad
Maryopthami
rrida bashitru Mar
gUAr dnnelS o-da
pt.BubbsalnBubb.yh
shiBub.ooBubbatr
swin…ang…ines
ging..siron.. sand
Maryof Egypthami
rrida bashitru Mar
T U’ dnnelS o-da
.BubbsalnB bb..
..Bub.ooBubb….
an g in es
siron sa
yof Eg
a bas
S o
The See’r The See’rThe See’rThe See’rThe See’r………
b……………\….n………pC B
r…………..\….e …….bse
ot…………\…...t…..eNol
her………\….….la…rie
‘s………..\….....Gslm
P……………..eieie
o….………..usnt
em.……….. E i
“`.- _da

“Equal” (having happened on the latin word for ‘level’ aequus wondered if that had come from the latin word for water “aqua“: and consequently had the question of: if our original idea of equality, or if our predisposition to equality as an idea, might have arisen from the sense that equality was, in its essence, somewhat water-like.)

Now of course that is pretty thin etymological suggestiveness I’m appealing to, and I’m sure it’s not the actual case, or even a little related to what must probably be the actual case, but it had me wondering again if it was at least true that water suggested equality more than the other three of the four basic elements of the classical world, air, earth, water, fire; — and I thought that it did, — because water alone among those elements really suggested the trait of levelness, water alone was really capable of that quality of being level, while to be level and equal seemed about the same.) “Level” “Even“

sign on the gate

Stendhal, Life of Henri Brulard, (trans. Catherine Alison Phillips):

Was it that I had a depressing personality? . . . And here, as I could not tell what to say, I began again, without thinking, to admire the sublime aspect of the ruins of Rome and its modern grandeur: opposite me the Coliseum; and, beneath my feet, the Farnese Palace, with its beautiful arcaded loggia full of modern works; the Corsini Palace, too, beneath my feet.

Farnese Palace. Corsini Palace. Wikipedia:

is the name given to an architectural feature, originally of Italian design. They are often a gallery or corridor at ground level, sometimes higher, on the facade of a building and open to the air on one side, where it is supported by columns or pierced openings in the wall.

….. A. a I
..v v ………iR
e a ……..,,,,,.v a v
hl……………,,,,,a i
ta…………..,,,. A R I
e. c ………….,,,,,.v a
m.. h ………….,,,,,.i r
o.. i …………..,,,,,.vair
r…………………………. p
d…………………………. a
)……………………………+
l……………………………..k
\……………….,,,…..r…..;;…… p/
\\……………….,,,…..d………. a` /
———————1=====——————-====-0———-
………..1………………………………………0
…………..1………………………………..0
………….1……………………………0
/………..1…………….0…;
.…..1…0….
g…………………………………….G
G……………………………………..G
e……………………………………..z
~…………………………………….!
1…………………………………..0
1………………………………….0
1………………………………..0
1……………………………0
0……….1…………1.0
…..0…1….1..0

…The way that fossils are like the ordinary and are suggestive of the idea of “eternal return” — fossils are totally random moments of time that are kept (recorded) effectively forever.

..the fossilized moment is the superior of the non-fossilized moment– in the way that an unrecorded event from the past is to a recorded event from the past

…what is meaningful about a thing as it lives is not what’s meaningful about it as a fossil.

This came to mind as I had had a memory that seemed to me like the mnemonic analogue of a fossil –it was a memory of nothing at all extraordinary– like the fossilized footprint of a Stegasaurus, which is not the footprint of some amazing leader or genius among the stegasauruses, but some random member of the group who happened randomly to be walking in that spot

[… do records tend naturally to be records of the acts of famous individuals or ordinary individuals… do records, the act of recording, favor certain individuals over others… how does remembering differ from polling? (how do remembering, writing down memories, and polling differ?) might a parallel history, or several of them, be occurring…]

a memory of nothing extraordinary (like having a specific memory of taking a spoon from out of the utensile drawer, which I do most everyday, but knowing the memory of taking this spoon was the memory of a particular day, a day which was itself in no other way memorable)

a memory of a pile of leaves I saw a year or two ago around this time –nothing extraordinary about the pile –nothing extraordinary about the day on which I saw the pile– and not better remembered than a fossilized footprint evokes the thing it has fossilized– but recalled better than all the other leaf piles I have seen

*

What was my one idea today: that two different nations could share the same physical boundaries, could coexist in the same physical space, be room-mates, like the U.K and France decide it makes more sense for both peoples to reside only in France, yet they keep their laws intact and the nations remain distinct.

οὐ γὰρ οὕτω φαμὲν τὴν τῶν ποιητῶν ἀρετὴν ὡσεὶ κττεόνων ἢ χαλκέων: ἀλλ᾽ ἐκείνη μὲν οὐδενὸς ἔχεται καλοῦ καὶ σεμνοῦ, ἡ δὲ ποιητοῦ συνέζευκται τῇ τοῦ ἀνθρώπου, καὶ οὐχ οἷόν τε ἀγαθὸν γενέσθαι ποιητὴν μὴ πρότερον γενηθέντα ἄνδρα ἀγαθόν.

“Of course we do not speak of the excellence of a poet in the same sense as we speak of that of a carpenter or a blacksmith; for their excellence depends upon no inherent nobility and dignity, whereas the excellence of a poet is inseparably associated with the excellence of the man himself, and it is impossible for one to become a good poet unless he has previously become a good man.” Geography 1.17.