Archive for January, 2021

Love is Neither Ignorant Nor Wise

January 31, 2021

Nice to find a Greek passage I understand pretty well…. In brief: the gods don’t desire to become wise because they are wise already, while the ignorant don’t desire to become wise because they don’t know they lack wisdom. Love, on the other hand, represents an in-between state, which is neither ignorant nor wise, neither rich nor poor,  …. Plato’s Symposium [English]:

[203e] … ὥστε οὔτε ἀπορεῖ Ἔρως ποτὲ οὔτε πλουτεῖ, σοφίας τε αὖ καὶ ἀμαθίας ἐν μέσῳ ἐστίν. [204a] ἔχει γὰρ ὧδε. θεῶν οὐδεὶς φιλοσοφεῖ οὐδ᾽ ἐπιθυμεῖ σοφὸς γενέσθαι—ἔστι γάρ—οὐδ᾽ εἴ τις ἄλλος σοφός, οὐ φιλοσοφεῖ. οὐδ᾽ αὖ οἱ ἀμαθεῖς φιλοσοφοῦσιν οὐδ᾽ ἐπιθυμοῦσι σοφοὶ γενέσθαι: αὐτὸ γὰρ τοῦτό ἐστι χαλεπὸν ἀμαθία, τὸ μὴ ὄντα καλὸν κἀγαθὸν μηδὲ φρόνιμον δοκεῖν αὑτῷ εἶναι ἱκανόν. οὔκουν ἐπιθυμεῖ ὁ μὴ οἰόμενος ἐνδεὴς εἶναι οὗ ἂν μὴ οἴηται ἐπιδεῖσθαι.

Freedom of Speech in Ancient Athens

January 30, 2021

Was interested in this from The Gorgias. Couldn’t think offhand of another place where Athens is singled out for its freedom of speech (ἐξουσία τοῦ λέγειν). 461e, Socrates speaking:

“It would indeed be a hard fate for you, my excellent friend, if having come to Athens, where there is more freedom of speech than anywhere in Greece, you should be the one person there who could not enjoy it.”

δεινὰ μεντἂν πάθοις, ὦ βέλτιστε, εἰ Ἀθήναζε ἀφικόμενος, οὗ τῆς Ἑλλάδος πλείστη ἐστὶν ἐξουσία τοῦ λέγειν, ἔπειτα σὺ ἐνταῦθα τούτου μόνος ἀτυχήσαις.

January 29, 2021

.la”” “How Story
.la”” “”; “ Of Jonah
.la””; “” “”; relates to idea
.la””; “” “”; of Amor
.la””; “” ” Fati”
.la””; “” “”; ….
.la””; “”;
.la””; “”; “How Story
.la””; “”; “”; “ Of Jonah
.la””; “”; “”; “”; relates to idea
.la””; “”; “”; “”; of Amor
.la””; “”; “”; ” Fati”
.la””; “”; “”; “”; ….

……… Napoleon’s
……..France
. ginglymus
Kanyakumari
Puranas Ganesha
Memphis Group squidge
cohete Toi invasion violac
Archibald Lampman…. cark
Archibald Lampman…. cark
cohete Toi invasion violac
Memphis Group squidge
Puranas Ganesha
Kanyakumari

Philogelos 145

January 28, 2021

εὐτραπελος κάπελος εὐρών ταξεώτην ἐπὶ τῇ γυναικὶ αὺτου εἶπεν· εὗρον ὅ οὐκ ἐζήτουν.

The jesting peddler finding a cop with his wife said — I found what I was not seeking. 

εὐτραπελος: tricky jesting ready with an answer. κάπελος: hawker, peddler, publican. ταξεώτην: officer of a magistrate. This translation has “I found what I was not bargaining for” as the punchline, which makes sense of the fact that the jester is called a merchant. Still puzzling why it’s a court officer with the jester’s wife.

January 27, 2021

Dream. Am walking with a young woman toward her bus stop. She seems to appreciate how truly anxious I am to get her there on time. We’re arm in arm and I’m holding a television’s remote control in my free hand. As a joke, I pretend that pressing it will move us along faster, but as I press it I feel it really is pushing us forward at greater speeds.

Author-centric novels

January 26, 2021

I just realized it had been long time since I’d questioned what used to be a point of frustration with me that 20th century fiction/ modernism tended to be so self-centered (that is, author-centered). To what did I attribute that author-centeredness, I now wonder:

–Capitalsm/ individualism. That we, and by extension our authors, all think of ourselves as heroes in need of being mythologized. (Or that we, who know we’re not heroes, look in awe at those who can consider themselves such?)

–Democracy/ divine average. Sort of the flip side of that. As members of a Democracy we celebrate ordinary people and ordinary things and authors find in their own lives authentic experiences of the ordinary. Hence a tendency toward the autobiographical.

–What I think of as Dan Green’s idea that the novel has ceded such concerns as plot and character to cinema and tv so as to concern itself more with stylistic concerns. But these stylistic concerns must come from, or be made to hang upon something real, in most cases, if only for structural reasons; so again, personal experience arises as a kind of default.

(To say that another way, probably Nicholson Baker would have written The Mezzanine from a totally different point of view, if that really mattered, but instead its from the point of view of someone very likely much like Nicholson Baker –I’m guessing– because his personal experience was readiest to hand.)

Counterpoint: quite a few film makers are “author-centric” — Woody Allen, Fellini…

–Could copyright law play a role? If you have to pay someone in order to rewrite their story (which I don’t think Shakespeare needed to?) that creates a clear incentive to write out of personal experience. The great stories are for big box office budgets.

–Maybe related to the Dan Green idea, commercial writing concerns have been superseded by personal or spiritual ones. People, even great writers, don’t imagine they can make a living writing, but want to use writing to tell their personal story and “be creative.”

January 25, 2021

Customers who ordered just a bagel today, nothing else: white hooded youth or young man, been ordering a cinammon raisin bagel with cream cheese each Sunday for the past month or more; friendly Jewish (?) gal, orders sesame bagel with cream cheese (“extra cream cheese” the past two times); Indian (?) immigrant couple who periodically come at the end of the night to order a wheat bagel with butter. (There was no wheat tonight so they took a sesame.)

White middle-aged woman who works at Giant as a cashier, whom I think of a single bagel getter (sesame with butter) ordered a small light roasted coffee with her bagel this morning.

Margrum: Enslaved by the sheer quantity of people

January 23, 2021

(A crime fighting duo, kind of like Magnum PI and Thomas Higgins, but concerned with issues of grammar and philosophy . . .  Margrum & Higgs)

* * *

Margrum wondered if the founders of this democracy had ever contemplated the possibility that one day the citizens of the Great Republic they had initiated with such gusto and had organized with such passionate care would be one day walking around with their wallets and purses and key chains bulging and stuffed with what were called bonus cards in order to get what were called bonuses.

Margrum was older now and it was difficult for him to say exactly if the word itself had changed or if it was merely his attitude toward the word that had, but he had begun to feel that he had started life as one of the free and proud and privileged of the world, one to whom “much had been given and from whom much would be expected,” and but who now felt surely and squarely and without too much in the way of hyperbole or self-pity that he was what had in former times been called a slave. A slave! (And perhaps one deserving of a handout.)

Not a slave bound with chains always so literal as handcuffs, nor so visible as bonus cards; but from every side, — legally, economically, physically, politically — he had come to feel constrained, and “slave” did not seem a word too melodramatic to describe the intensity of his feelings about this constraint — his sure feelings of the impossibility of making what a reasonable person might call progress. (And he didn’t feel like a slave — in fact, he often didn’t feel that way — but felt that he was a slave: felt there had been this dramatic palpable change in his societal status.)

He had been raised with the thought that slavery had been abolished some while ago; he was now of an experience that told him such things go away only to return again in more familiar, less imposing forms. To a degree, Margrum felt defeated and enslaved by the mere fact of the sheer quantity of people that were alive with him now (and these people had to be organized somehow after all; slavery, he supposed, would do just fine!) (When there are so many people all about maybe that just naturally results in there being one Pharaoh over all the slaves. Maybe the population size was itself a sort of Pharaoh.) He who had always thought of himself as nothing special but no redundancy or duplicate, now did very much indeed question the grounds for making such a distinction, with all these people grown up around him.

Or maybe it was not that he had become a slave (he didn’t for example think he belonged to anyone else). Maybe he had only become (without having fully realized it was happening) kind of poor. And a lot of people with him too, a whole class of people made poor without their quite having known. As if he and everyone else he knew, the whole middle class of the country even, or a chunk of it, like a giant ice shelf calved from the polar cap, had been barreling along having a good time, having the feeling they were making progress, only gradually the times became less good, the road more rocky with more traffic, with less space in the overhead compartment, no leg room, with food that didn’t taste right –you had to go to unaffordable stores to get the decent food– until finally they came to understand that they were in the middle class no longer. They still had cars, houses, college educations, children, in many cases, the trappings of the middle class, but now none of it was paid for, none of it was any good. They had cars and homes and educations, but they were shoddy and imbued with cheapness, pieces of paper, and the sense was there was to be no future.

But what most pisses him off at the moment is his can of beer. He’s looking at it and it really pisses him off to the extent that he completely forgets the issue of his enslavement. They have altered the shape of the can to save money and increase profit. It isn’t a comely shape. Anyhow, he’s passed out.

January 22, 2021

……………m t m
……………m . t .m
……………m .. t ..m
……………m t m
……………m …. t ….m
……………m ….. t …..m
……………w …………a R
……………n………..a..v
……………c.e at
……………t………..M mc………..
……………m………..t a….o…….
.v v iR v v
..e a …..,,,,.v a v
hl……………..,,,,,a i
..Limbs. of the. horse
..e. c …………,,,,,.v a
.m h ……….,,,,,.i r
.o iA aIva i r
..

January 21, 2021

A throwback to PLANTS days, I think this concerns the Delphinium ajacis, the origin story of which is related to the Homeric hero Ajax.

Pausanias 1.35.4 [English]

λέγουσι δὲ οἱ περὶ τὴν Σαλαμῖνα οἰκοῦντες ἀποθανόντος Αἴαντος τὸ ἄνθος σφίσιν ἐν τῇ γῇ τότε φανῆναι πρῶτον: λευκόν ἐστιν, ὑπέρυθρον, κρίνου καὶ αὐτὸ ἔλασσον καὶ τὰ φύλλα: γράμματα δὲ ἔπεστιν οἷα τοῖς ὑακίνθοις καὶ τούτῳ.

You are not full with it, and it is not full with you, and yet you can be no where else.

January 20, 2021

Leering at attractive persons, objects, as the opposite of Schopenhauer’s “pure subject” (and maybe of scientific inquiry also — is leering the opposite of science or can one be said to leer through a microscope? Maybe the scientist as a scientist is like the artist as an artist a pure subject.)

Rather than becoming “full” with the object, rather than concentrating on it, one is distracted by it and made to vanish in it… You are not full with it, and it is not full with you, and yet you can be no where else. One is objectified by the object (made into a leerer for one thing) rather than being the observing subject of the object.